As much as it pains me to say this, Call of Duty did it better this time around. Neither of these is true in Battlefield 3. In Assassin’s Creed, you get more powerful as you rank up, but the game makes an attempt to pair you with people of your own skill level. See, if you’re playing Call of Duty, the guns you unlock are, for the most part, not better than what you already have. I’m not entirely opposed to unlocking things as you go along, but there’s a way you need to do it. In the developers’ quest to fuck shit up and be like Call of Duty, they just had to put in progression. Hopefully, when the Karakand expansion comes out, DICE will retain the scale of those old maps instead of giving us the 32-player version, which gets very crowded with 64 combatants.īut every game has its downsides, and Battlefield 3 is no exception. Personally, I would have liked to see some larger maps rather than the five control point maximum we have now. It ends up being bigger than Bad Company 2, but not as big as Battlefield 2. The mechanics are the same, but the scale is significantly different. Conquest maps, however are modified from previous games. Rush is exactly like you remember it from BFBC2. Gameplay is focused more or less on two game modes, Rush and Conquest. In other words, the guns in BF3 just feel right. The response of the virtual trigger is as crisp and satisfying as the real-life feedback received when landing the killing blow of a club to a baby seal’s adorable little skull. You could never really feel like you were actually fake-shooting a not-real person. I don’t know if any of you played Bad Company 2, but in that game there was something about the guns that just felt… off. But regardless, it’s shiny and it gets the job done well.Īnd then when you get into the game, and you get to use the guns. And the thing desperately needs a waitlist function for full servers. Sure there’s a few down sides: you have to be in a game or in the campaign to edit your video options, and there’s no way to edit your loadout without joining a server. You can see if your favorite servers are populated before deciding to launch the game, and you can do stuff like surf Top Tier Tactics while Battlefield 3 loads the level in the background. and it’s fucking amazing.īattlefield games have never had the best server browsers before, and this one does its job beautifully, especially since the server list populates instantly. It’s weird, it’s different, it’s the most perplexing choice that they made. ![]() The first thing you’ll notice when you click the launch button is that no fucking game launches! Yes, Battlefield simply opens up a web page, known as “Battlelog” in your browser of choice. And for that reason, this is a review entirely focused on the PC version’s multiplayer. As such, I don’t give two shits about how bad the single player campaign may or may not be, or how the game’s console servers are down all the time I’m playing the way it was meant to be played. But for those of us who are perfectly willing to enjoy a solid new entry in the series, you’re in for a treat, because Battlefield 3 is fucking awesome!Īs far as I’m concerned, Battlefield is a multiplayer PC franchise. No matter how hard you want it to be, it will never be its predecessor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |